The American Institute of CPAs in a March 31 letter to House of Representatives voiced its “strong support” for a series of tax administration bills passed in recent days.

The American Institute of CPAs in a March 31 letter to House of Representatives voiced its “strong support” for a series of tax administration bills passed in recent days.

The four bills highlighted in the letter include the Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act (H.R. 1152), the Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act (H.R. 998), the Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act (H.R. 517), and the Disaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act (H.R. 1491).

All four bills passed unanimously.

H.R. 1152 would apply the “mailbox” rule to electronically submitted tax returns and payments. Currently, a paper return or payment is counted as “received” based on the postmark of the envelope, but its electronic equivalent is counted as “received” when the electronic submission arrived or is reviewed. This bill would change all payment and tax form submissions to follow the mailbox rule, regardless of mode of delivery.

“The AICPA has previously recommended this change and thinks it would offer clarity and simplification to the payment and document submission process,” the organization said in the letter.

H.R. 998 “would require notices describing a mathematical or clerical error be made in plain language, and require the Treasury Secretary to provide additional procedures for requesting an abatement of a math or clerical adjustment, including by telephone or in person, among other provisions,” the letter states.

H.R. 517 would allow the IRS to grant federal tax relief once a state governor declares a state of emergency following a natural disaster, which is quicker than waiting for the federal government to declare a state of emergency as directed under current law, which could take weeks after the state disaster declaration. This bill “would also expand the mandatory federal filing extension under section 7508(d) from 60 days to 120 days, providing taxpayers with additional time to file tax returns following a disaster,” the letter notes, adding that increasing the period “would provide taxpayers and tax practitioners much needed relief, even before a disaster strikes.”

H.R. 1491 would extend deadlines for disaster victims to file for a tax refund or tax credit. The legislative solution “granting an automatic extension to the refund or credit lookback period would place taxpayers affected my major disasters on equal footing as taxpayers not impacted by major disasters and would afford greater clarity and certainty to taxpayers and tax practitioners regarding this lookback period,” AICPA said.

Also passed by the House was the National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act (H.R. 997) which, according to a summary of the bill on Congress.gov, “authorizes the National Taxpayer Advocate to appoint legal counsel within the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) to report directly to the National Taxpayer Advocate. The bill also expands the authority of the National Taxpayer Advocate to take personnel actions with respect to local taxpayer advocates (located in each state) to include actions with respect to any employee of TAS.”

Finally, the House passed H.R. 1155, the Recovery of Stolen Checks Act, which would require the Treasury to establish procedures that would allow a taxpayer to elect to receive replacement funds electronically from a physical check that was lost or stolen.

All bills passed unanimously. The passed legislation mirrors some of the provisions included in a discussion draft legislation issued by the Senate Finance Committee in January 2025. A section-by-section summary of the Senate discussion draft legislation can be found here.

AICPA’s tax policy and advocacy comment letters for 2025 can be found here.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The Tax Court ruled that the value claimed on a taxpayer’s return exceeded the value of a conversation easement by 7,694 percent. The taxpayer was a limited liability company, classified as a TEFRA partnership. The Tax Court used the comparable sales method, as backstopped by the price actually paid to acquire the property.

The Tax Court ruled that the value claimed on a taxpayer’s return exceeded the value of a conversation easement by 7,694 percent. The taxpayer was a limited liability company, classified as a TEFRA partnership. The Tax Court used the comparable sales method, as backstopped by the price actually paid to acquire the property.

The taxpayer was entitled to a charitable contribution deduction based on its fair market value. The easement was granted upon rural land in Alabama. The property was zoned A–1 Agricultural, which permitted agricultural and light residential use only. The property transaction at occurred at arm’s length between a willing seller and a willing buyer.

Rezoning

The taxpayer failed to establish that the highest and best use of the property before the granting of the easement was limestone mining. The taxpayer failed to prove that rezoning to permit mining use was reasonably probable.

Land Value

The taxpayer’s experts erroneously equated the value of raw land with the net present value of a hypothetical limestone business conducted on the land. It would not be profitable to pay the entire projected value of the business.

Penalty Imposed

The claimed value of the easement exceeded the correct value by 7,694 percent. Therefore, the taxpayer was liable for a 40 percent penalty for a gross valuation misstatement under Code Sec. 6662(h).

Ranch Springs, LLC, 164 TC No. 6, Dec. 62,636

State and local housing credit agencies that allocate low-income housing tax credits and states and other issuers of tax-exempt private activity bonds have been provided with a listing of the proper population figures to be used when calculating the 2025:

State and local housing credit agencies that allocate low-income housing tax credits and states and other issuers of tax-exempt private activity bonds have been provided with a listing of the proper population figures to be used when calculating the 2025:

• calendar-year population-based component of the state housing credit ceiling under Code Sec. 42(h)(3)(C)(ii);
• calendar-year private activity bond volume cap under Code Sec. 146; and
• exempt facility bond volume limit under Code Sec. 142(k)(5)

These figures are derived from the estimates of the resident populations of the 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, which were released by the Bureau of the Census on December 19, 2024. The figures for the insular areas of American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands are the midyear population figures in the U.S. Census Bureau’s International Database.

Notice 2025-18

The value of assets of a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trust includible in a decedent's gross estate was not reduced by the amount of a settlement intended to compensate the decedent for undistributed income.

The value of assets of a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trust includible in a decedent's gross estate was not reduced by the amount of a settlement intended to compensate the decedent for undistributed income.

The trust property consisted of an interest in a family limited partnership (FLP), which held title to ten rental properties, and cash and marketable securities. To resolve a claim by the decedent's estate that the trustees failed to pay the decedent the full amount of income generated by the FLP, the trust and the decedent's children's trusts agreed to be jointly and severally liable for a settlement payment to her estate. The Tax Court found an estate tax deficiency, rejecting the estate's claim that the trust assets should be reduced by the settlement amount and alternatively, that the settlement claim was deductible from the gross estate as an administration expense (P. Kalikow Est., Dec. 62,167(M), TC Memo. 2023-21).

Trust Not Property of the Estate

The estate presented no support for the argument that the liability affected the fair market value of the trust assets on the decedent's date of death. The trust, according to the court, was a legal entity that was not itself an asset of the estate. Thus, a liability that belonged to the trust but had no impact on the value of the underlying assets did not change the value of the gross estate. Furthermore, the settlement did not burden the trust assets. A hypothetical purchaser of the FLP interest, the largest asset of the trust, would not assume the liability and, therefore, would not regard the liability as affecting the price. When the parties stipulated the value of the FLP interest, the estate was aware of the undistributed income claim. Consequently, the value of the assets included in the gross estate was not diminished by the amount of the undistributed income claim.

Claim Not an Estate Expense

The claim was owed to the estate by the trust to correct the trustees' failure to distribute income from the rental properties during the decedent's lifetime. As such, the claim was property included in the gross estate, not an expense of the estate. The court explained that even though the liability was owed by an entity that held assets included within the taxable estate, the claim itself was not an estate expense. The court did not address the estate's theoretical argument that the estate would be taxed twice on the underlying assets held in the trust and the amount of the settlement because the settlement was part of the decedent's residuary estate, which was distributed to a charity. As a result, the claim was not a deductible administration expense of the estate.

P.B. Kalikow, Est., CA-2

An individual was not entitled to deduct flowthrough loss from the forfeiture of his S Corporation’s portion of funds seized by the U.S. Marshals Service for public policy reasons. The taxpayer pleaded guilty to charges of bribery, fraud and money laundering. Subsequently, the U.S. Marshals Service seized money from several bank accounts held in the taxpayer’s name or his wholly owned corporation. 

An individual was not entitled to deduct flowthrough loss from the forfeiture of his S Corporation’s portion of funds seized by the U.S. Marshals Service for public policy reasons. The taxpayer pleaded guilty to charges of bribery, fraud and money laundering. Subsequently, the U.S. Marshals Service seized money from several bank accounts held in the taxpayer’s name or his wholly owned corporation. The S corporation claimed a loss deduction related to its portion of the asset seizures on its return and the taxpayer reported a corresponding passthrough loss on his return.

However, Courts have uniformly held that loss deductions for forfeitures in connection with a criminal conviction frustrate public policy by reducing the "sting" of the penalty. The taxpayer maintained that the public policy doctrine did not apply here, primarily because the S corporation was never indicted or charged with wrongdoing. However, even if the S corporation was entitled to claim a deduction for the asset seizures, the public policy doctrine barred the taxpayer from reporting his passthrough share. The public policy doctrine was not so rigid or formulaic that it may apply only when the convicted person himself hands over a fine or penalty.

Hampton, TC Memo. 2025-32, Dec. 62,642(M)

A taxpayer who may have misplaced or lost a copy of his tax return that was already filed with the IRS or whose copy may have been destroyed in a fire, flood, or other disaster may need information contained on that return in order to complete his or her return for the current year. In addition, an individual may be required by a governmental agency or other entity, such as a mortgage lender or the Small Business Administration, to supply a copy of his or a related party's tax return.

A taxpayer who may have misplaced or lost a copy of his tax return that was already filed with the IRS or whose copy may have been destroyed in a fire, flood, or other disaster may need information contained on that return in order to complete his or her return for the current year. In addition, an individual may be required by a governmental agency or other entity, such as a mortgage lender or the Small Business Administration, to supply a copy of his or a related party's tax return.

In such circumstances, you may obtain a copy of your tax return by filing Form 4506, Request for Copy or Transcript of Tax Form, along with the applicable fee, to the IRS Service Center where the return was filed. Also, tax account information based on the return may be obtained free of charge from IRS Taxpayer Service Offices. You may also request a transcript that will show most lines from the original return, including accompanying forms and schedules.

Fees

There is no charge to request a tax return transcript of the Form 1040 series filed during the current calendar year and the three preceding calendar years. For other requests, a fee of $23.00 per tax period requested must be paid in order to obtain copies of a return. Taxpayers seeking tax account information (such as adjusted gross income, amount of tax, or amount of refund) should contact their local IRS Taxpayer Service Office, which will provide the account information free of charge.

Timing of requests

A request for a copy of a return must be received by the IRS within 60 days following the date when it was signed and dated by the taxpayer. It may take up to 60 calendar days to get a copy of a tax form or Form W-2 information. If a return has been recently filed, the taxpayer must allow six weeks before requesting a copy of the return or other information. The IRS cautions that returns filed more than six years ago may not be available for making copies; tax account information, however, is generally available for these periods.

You may be able to save some time by going directly to your tax return preparer for the information. Although a return preparer may retain a copy of the taxpayer's return, however, there is no absolute requirement to do so. Preparers must retain for three years either a copy of each completed return and claim for refund or a list of the names and taxpayer identification numbers of taxpayers for whom returns or claims have been prepared.

Every business owner knows that he or she is responsible for payroll taxes for employees but not for independent contractors. This is the general rule, but like every rule in the Tax Code, there are exceptions.

Every business owner knows that he or she is responsible for payroll taxes for employees but not for independent contractors. This is the general rule, but like every rule in the Tax Code, there are exceptions.

Some workers, even if they are called independent contractors, must be treated as employees for tax purposes. They are called statutory employees. You are required to withhold and pay certain payroll taxes, under certain circumstances. If you fail to withhold payroll taxes for these workers, you could be liable for significant fines and penalties.

Conditions

Some conditions must be met to transform an independent contractor into a statutory employee. First, only certain types of work trigger the change in treatment. Second, a contract between you and the worker must contemplate that the worker will personally perform substantially all of the work. Third, the worker's investment in equipment and property used to provide the services usually is insubstantial. Fourth, the services usually are performed on a regular and continuing basis.

Here's a look at some of the specific occupations that are treated as statutory employment.

Agent-Drivers

Agent-drivers and commission drivers who deliver specified products are deemed statutory employees for payroll tax purposes. These are individuals wh

-- Operate their own trucks;

-- Serve customers designated by you;

-- Serve customers they solicit on their own;

-- Make wholesale or retail sales; and

-- Paid commissions on their sales.

These drivers are treated as your employees if they distribute:

-- Beverages (other than milk);

-- Meat;

-- Fruit;

-- Vegetables;

-- Bakery products; or

-- Laundry

Generally, you are not required to withhold income taxes for agent-drivers but you must withhold FICA and federal unemployment taxes.

Salespeople

A very specific group of salespeople are treated as employees even if your arrangement terms them independent contractors. These individuals remit orders on your behalf from customers who are:

-- Retailers;

-- Wholesalers;

-- Contractors; or

-- Operators of hotels and restaurants.

The individuals must work full-time for you. In addition, the orders they remit must be for items that your customers will resell or use as supplies in their business. Generally, you must withhold FICA and federal unemployment taxes for these salespersons.

Homeworkers

Some individuals who work at home for you must be treated as employees. Frequently, these individuals work on a contract or piecework basis. A common example is an individual you hire to type your correspondence, using his or her computer equipment, at home.

Your payroll tax obligation for homeworkers generally kicks-in when you've paid the workers $100 in cash wages during the year. Once you've reached the $100 threshold, all wages paid during the year are subject to FICA taxes.

This is a confusing area of the tax law. Our office can help clarify if an independent contractor is a statutory employee so you don't miss your important payroll tax obligations. Contact us if you have any questions.

I sold a small piece of property two years ago. Going through my records recently I realized that the gain on that sale was never reported on my tax return. What should I do now?

A: The usual solution is to file an amended return for that year, paying any additional tax due plus interest and a late payment penalty. You are not permitted simply to add it to this year's tax return.

An amended return must be filed, and any additional tax due paid, by any taxpayer who has omitted an income item for a previous tax year for which the statute of limitations period (which is generally three years) is still open. When an original, and then an amended return is filed, the statute of limitations generally starts running on the original filing.

Some taxpayers think they can wait until a few days before the three-year limitations period is about to expire to file their amended return to avoid any further IRS audit of it. They should think again. To cover this ploy, an exception to the three-year limitations period on assessment is made when the taxpayer files an amended return within 60 days before the end of the limitations period on assessment. In this situation, the IRS has 60 days from when it gets the amended return to assess the additional tax due as reported, even if the usual three-year period would normally otherwise end.

Taxpayers who plan to wait until after the three-year limitation expires, and then do nothing, are playing an even more dangerous game.

First, the IRS tends to pull most returns for audit between the second and third year after filing. If the IRS catches a taxpayer for unreported income before he or she fesses up, the penalties are generally much worse.

Second, even though initially not reporting some taxable gain may be just a mistake, hiding the income once you discover that it has not been reported may subject you to criminal fraud, which carries even higher penalties …and no statute of limitations.

A new IRS ruling confirms that HRAs are entitled to significant tax breaks. Properly structured, they can provide a deduction for the business, tax-free benefits for employees, and more direct and personal control over health care costs…a classic "win-win" situation, compliments of the tax code.

Health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) have just been given the "green light" by the IRS -paving the way for you and many businesses to consider whether an HRA is a good solution to rising health-care costs.

A new IRS ruling confirms that HRAs are entitled to significant tax breaks. Properly structured, they can provide a deduction for the business, tax-free benefits for employees, and more direct and personal control over health care costs…a classic "win-win" situation, complements of the tax code.

As Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill put it, "With this new guidance, we clear the way for employers to adopt health plans with patient-directed features so that employees have more choice and greater control over their health care coverage."

Patient-directed health plan

An HRA is a written arrangement set up by employers to provide employees with reimbursement up to a pre-selected amount for a variety of medical expenses. In order to qualify, an HRA must:

• Be funded solely by employer contributions and never through voluntary salary reduction contributions under a cafeteria plan or by any other form of employee contribution;

• Require funds to be used to reimburse employees for substantiated medical expenses of employees, their spouses, and dependents.

The two outstanding features of an HRA are:

• (1) Each employee gets his or her own account balance that may be carried over from year to year, indefinitely. Flexible spending accounts (FSAs), in contrast, work on a "use-it and lose-it" basis under which amounts left unspent at the end of the year are lost. The carryover feature of the HRA gives employees incentive to spend wisely and save on medical costs whenever possible, so that their "personal care accounts" can increase over the years.

• (2) Amounts in the HRA can be used to pay medical insurance premiums as well as for reimbursement of medical services and other costs. FSAs are expressly prohibited from being used to pay insurance premiums.

Options

HRAs can offer an employer great flexibility in the overall health care package presented to employees. An HRA can either supplement a deductible group health plan, or it can operate alone in providing your employees with medical benefits. It can also be used together with FSAs to enhance the benefits of both.

How to get started

To win the benefits of an HRA, certain rules must be followed. HRAs may only provide benefits that cover substantiated medical expenses. They cannot discriminate in favor of highly-compensated employees.

While an HRA cannot be funded within a cafeteria plan, employers can coordinate cafeteria plan benefits with HRAs in a manner that provides an attractive, yet IRS-sanctioned package. Planning can also enhance other HRA features.

Contact this office for further details on how an HRA can improve your financial as well as medical health.

U.S. Savings Bonds can be a relatively risk-free investment during time of upheaval in the stock market, such as we are experiencing now. There are two different types of savings bonds for tax purposes. The first includes Series EE bonds and Series I bonds. If you invest in these bonds, you have a choice of reporting interest as it accrues each year you hold the bond until you sell it or redeem it. A second category consists of a special type of savings bond, HH bonds, on which income generally must be reported as accrued.

U.S. Savings Bonds can be a relatively risk-free investment during time of upheaval in the stock market, such as we are experiencing now. There are two different types of savings bonds for tax purposes. The first includes Series EE bonds and Series I bonds. You purchase these bonds at a discount from their face value and they accrue interest until reaching face value at maturity.

If you invest in these bonds, you have a choice of reporting interest as it accrues each year you hold the bond until you sell it or redeem it.

A second category consists of a special type of savings bond, HH bonds, on which income generally must be reported as accrued.

Series EE and I bonds

Generally, you do not have to pay taxes on interest accruing on EE and I bonds until they mature. You can make a special election to pay tax on the interest as it accrues.

Most investors choose not to make this election. However, if you have little or no other taxable income during the years in which the bond is maturing, you may be better off electing to pay tax annually as the bond earns interest until it reaches maturity, since you will be paying taxes on annual interest at a lower tax rate.

Once you make the election to pay tax annually, the election applies to all Series EE and I bonds that you own for all future years. This means the election cannot be made on a bond-by-bond basis. The IRS has a special rule and you may be able to cancel your election in some circumstances.

Higher education expenses

If you buy Series EE bonds, you can exclude all the interest earned at maturity if you use the bond to pay for higher education expenses. Many, but not all, higher education expenses qualify. Check with your tax advisor.

Series HH bonds

You may have acquired a special type of bond, the HH bond, which cannot be purchased for cash. You obtain HH bonds in exchange for EE bonds. HH bonds pay interest semi-annually at a variable interest rate.

Interest is reportable when you receive it. However, there is one important exception. If you obtained HH bonds in exchange for EE bonds, on which you did not pay interest currently, interest continues to be deferred until the bond is redeemed or matures. HH bonds mature in 10 years.

Generally, if you do volunteer work for a charity, you are not entitled to deduct the cost of services you perform for the charity. However, if in connection with the volunteer work you incur out-of-pocket expenses, you may be entitled to deduct some of those expenses.

Q. I spend 20 hours every week cooking meals and delivering them to an organization that feeds the hungry and homeless. Am I entitled to a deduction for my time and the food I pay for out of my own money?

A. Generally, if you do volunteer work for a charity, you are not entitled to deduct the cost of services you perform for the charity. However, if in connection with the volunteer work you incur out-of-pocket expenses, you may be entitled to deduct some of those expenses.

Qualifying expenses

If the amounts that you pay for food and other supplies used in the preparation and packaging of the meals are not reimbursed by the charity, generally you may deduct these expenses as contributions to the charity.

In addition, if the amounts that you pay to travel by car or other means to deliver the meals are not reimbursed by the charity, and you derive no personal benefit from the travel, the expenses are deductible. Qualifying expenses include gasoline for your car and fares for taxis or public transportation.

Special mileage rate

If you drive your own vehicle to deliver the meals, you can use a special IRS mileage rate to calculate charitable contribution deductions involving use of your car. The standard mileage rate for charitable purposes, which is statutorily set, is 14 cents per mile.

Other expenses

Other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with services you provide to a charity that are deductible include costs related to uniforms, travel, meals, and lodging. Sometimes, expenses incurred while serving as a charity's delegate to a convention may be deducted.

Keep receipts

If you take a deduction for out-of-pocket expenses you incurred incident to your performance of services for a charity, it is important to have receipts to document expenses. It is also a good idea to get a written acknowledgement from the charity for the services you provide.